Vincent Ekow Assafuah has petitioned CHRAJ to investigate suspected corruption, abuse of public power, conflicts of interest and administrative irregularities in World Cup visa facilitation arrangements involving public institutions. The petition invokes articles 218(a) and 218(e) of the Constitution and section 7(1)(a), (e) and (f) of the CHRAJ Act, 1993 (Act 456). It seeks examination of relevant records and explanations from the institutions concerned, making the scope of CHRAJ’s investigative mandate the principal point for public-law practitioners. The report does not establish that CHRAJ has opened an investigation or made any finding of misconduct.
Search Watch live Home News Politics Business Sports Entertainment Opinion Videos More Full Text: Ekow Assafuah petitions CHRAJ to probe alleged visa irregularities for 2026 World Cup I ask it to investigate the relevant records, require explanations from the appropriate public institutions and determine whether corruption, abuse of power, administrative injustice or other misconduct within its mandate has occurred.
Copy link Add 3News as your preferred source on Google Preferred source Article tools Ask AI Listen to this article AI narration Playback position 0:00 20:09 10 10 Playback speed 1× FORMAL PETITION FOR AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO SUSPECTED CORRUPTION, ABUSE OF PUBLIC POWER, POSSIBLE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND ADMINISTRATIVE IRREGULARITIES IN THE ALLOCATION AND MANAGEMENT OF 2026 FIFA WORLD CUP VISA OPPORTUNITIES INVOLVING THE NATIONAL SPORTS AUTHORITY, GHANA TOURISM AUTHORITY AND MINISTRY OF SPORTS AND RECREATION.
I submit this petition pursuant to articles 218(a) and 218(e) of the 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Ghana, read together with section 7(1)(a), (e) and (f) of the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice Act, 1993 (Act 456), which provide the constitutional and statutory framework for the Commission’s functions in relation to complaints concerning injustice, corruption, abuse of power, unfair treatment by public officers and other matters falling within its prescribed mandate.
I respectfully invoke the Commission’s jurisdiction to investigate whether the conduct of the relevant public institutions and their officers in connection with the 2026 FIFA World Cup visa facilitation arrangements involved corruption, abuse of public power, conflicts of interest, administrative irregularities or other conduct contrary to the applicable constitutional, statutory and administrative standards.
Accordingly, I request the Commission to independently examine the relevant institutional decisions, beneficiary-selection procedures, official representations, financial transactions and accountability mechanisms; determine whether any public officer failed to discharge a legal or administrative duty; and make such findings, recommendations, referrals or other determinations as are authorized by the Constitution and applicable law.
I consider the circumstances surrounding these arrangements sufficiently serious to warrant the attention of your Office.
The circumstances outlined in this petition raise important questions about the exercise of public authority, the transparency of beneficiary selection, the accuracy of institutional representations, the handling of payments and the adequacy of the accountability mechanisms maintained by the institutions involved.
I consider these matters deserving of the Commission’s independent attention because public institutions must be able to demonstrate that their decisions are made for proper purposes, that the exercise of discretion is fair and transparent, and that public officers discharge their responsibilities in accordance with the Constitution and applicable law.
My concerns relate principally to the conduct of the National Sports Authority (NSA), the Ghana Tourism Authority (GTA) and the Ministry of Sports and Recreation, together with the involvement of TRIBE Culture Fest, the Ghana Tourism Federation (GHATOF) and other individuals or entities whose participation may be established through investigation.
I respectfully invoke the Commission’s constitutional and statutory mandate, including the relevant provisions of articles 218(a) and 218(e) of the 1992 Constitution and the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice Act, 1993 (Act 456), to request an impartial examination of the matters set out below.
I do not ask the Commission to treat allegations as established findings.
I ask it to investigate the relevant records, require explanations from the appropriate public institutions and determine whether corruption, abuse of power, administrative injustice or other misconduct within its mandate has occurred.
1. THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND THE DUTY OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACCOUNTABILITY
The 2026 FIFA World Cup presented Ghana with an opportunity to promote tourism, support sporting development and strengthen the country’s international profile.
The involvement of public institutions in arrangements connected with such an event should therefore have been accompanied by clear procedures, transparent selection criteria, proper verification of beneficiaries and adequate financial controls.
Where opportunities are allocated through public institutions, the criteria governing selection should be identifiable and defensible.
Where officials certify individuals as employees, volunteers or authorised personnel, the information supplied should be supported by appropriate records.
Where applicants are charged money, the purpose of the charges and the handling of the funds should be capable of verification.
I am concerned that the reported discrepancies surrounding beneficiary lists, the questions raised about the status of persons presented as institutional personnel, the reported collection of payments and the requests for explanations concerning sponsorship proceeds raise legitimate questions about the quality of administrative oversight exercised in this process.
These questions should not be resolved through general assurances or informal explanations alone. They require an examination of the records, the procedures adopted and the conduct of the public officers responsible for the relevant decisions.
I respectfully request that the Commission undertake this examination in the interests of administrative justice, institutional integrity and public confidence.
2. THE NSA–TRIBE ARRANGEMENT AND THE VERIFICATION OF BENEFICIARIES
Documents available to me indicate that the NSA and TRIBE Culture Fest entered into a Memorandum of Understanding dated 2 June 2025, followed by supplementary arrangements dated 19 January 2026.
The supplementary arrangements reportedly specified charges of US$3,000 per person for United States visa facilitation and US$2,000 per person for Canadian visa facilitation.
Subsequent correspondence reportedly included a list of 22 proposed personnel transmitted on 28 January 2026 and a letter dated 18 March 2026 in which the NSA certified four individuals as bona fide NSA staff.
I understand that the United States Embassy’s Fraud Prevention Unit subsequently requested employment letters in connection with its verification process.
Further correspondence dated 28 May 2026 reportedly referred to persons described as NSA volunteers or event coordinators.
A list dated 8 June 2026 reportedly contained 102 names, of whom only 15 could be verified as NSA personnel through the records examined. I consider these discrepancies important from an administrative accountability perspective.
The Commission should establish the criteria used to select and classify the beneficiaries, the records relied upon to verify their status, the officials responsible for approving the relevant lists and the procedures followed before information was transmitted to the diplomatic missions.